State Neutrality and Ecclesial Dissension: Reflections on the case Tothpal and Szabo v. Romania

State Neutrality /Ecclesial Dissension

By Nicolas Bauer1590149440826

The European Court of Human Rights recognizes a right of religious organizations to autonomy, both doctrinal and disciplinary. It set this principle aside in the case of Tothpal and Szabo v. Romania of 19 February 2019, in favour of a more individualistic vision of religious freedom. This stance is surprising, but will probably remain isolated in the Court’s case law. Beyond this point, the article offers a reflection on the difficult implementing of the duty of neutrality of the State in religious matters. It highlights some theological presuppositions implicitly entailed in the Court’s argument and questions their religious neutrality.


Read the full PDF document

Cookies & Privacy

There is no advertising for any third party on our website. We merely use cookies to improve your navigation experience (technical cookies) and to allow us to analyze the way you consult our websites in order to improve it (analytics cookies). The personal information that may be requested on some pages of our website (subscribing to our Newsletter, signing a petition,  making a donation...) is optional. We do not share any of this information we may collect with third parties. You can check here for our privacy & security policy for more information.

I refuse analytics cookies