Separatism: France Must Guarantee the Right to ConvertGradient Overlay
French Institutions

Separatism: France Must Guarantee the Right to Convert

France: Upholding the Right to Convert

By ECLJ1613399727335
Share

For the signers of this tribune, including intellectuals such as Boualem Sansal, as well as former Muslims who have left Islam, such as Joseph Fadelle, France must establish a "crime of obstructing conversion" in its criminal law.

Op-Ed published in French in Le Figaro Vox on February 5, 2021.

Apostasy is punishable by death in Islam.

As a result, Muslims are not free to leave this religion. Even in France, those who leave Islam, even more when to convert to another religion, are often rejected by their families and communities, they are subjected to pressure, threats and sometimes even violence that can go as far as murder. Frequently, they are forced to live their faith underground and to move away.

Such a situation is unacceptable in France, a land of Christianity and freedom.

The draft bill of law confirming the respect for the principles of the Republic must be an opportunity to denounce and sanction these "obstructions to conversion" in order to strengthen freedom of conscience, especially for people of Muslim origin.

The bill contains a good provision in this regard because it increases the penalties for those who obstruct freedom of conscience and religion from the 1905 law. Thus, article 38 of the bill punishes with one year imprisonment and a fine of 15,000 euros authors of threats that affect an individual's exercise of religion and increases the penalty to three years imprisonment and a fine of 45,000 euros when the perpetrator acts with assault or violence.

It targets persons who "have determined [another person] to practise or refrain from practising a religion, to join or cease to join a religious association, to contribute to or refrain from contributing to the costs of a religion."

Until now, the penalty incurred was only a 5th class ticket and/or imprisonment for six days to two months. The new system therefore seriously reinforces the penalty incurred, on the recommendation of the Council of State.

This new drafting is therefore a step in the right direction, but it remains insufficient because it only allows for the punishment of threats when they have been "determined", i.e., forcing a person to practice or refrain from practicing. It does not sanction, as such, threats in the religious sphere.

Thus, this penal provision does not effectively protect a person who would be dissuaded, under pressure from their community, from leaving Islam or another religion. The importance of freedom of conscience, and the reality of intra-community religious pressure, justifies and even requires that a provision be introduced in the bill explicitly punishing "obstructing conversion". This could easily be done in Article 38.

It would also be possible to add a reference to the freedoms of conscience and worship in article 431-1 of the penal code, which punishes the fact of obstructing, in a concerted manner and with the help of threats, blows, violence, assault, destruction or degradation the exercise of the freedom of expression, work, association, assembly or demonstration.

The right to change one's religion must be effectively defended and guaranteed, including under criminal law. When it was discussed at the United Nations, some Muslim countries opposed it in the name of Sharia and succeeded in having it silenced. Therefore, the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (1966) only guarantees the freedom "to have or to adopt a religion or belief of one's choice", but not explicitly the freedom to change it, unlike the European Convention on Human Rights.

The denial of the freedom to change religion is an essential element of Sharia law, but it is unacceptable that certain populations, in France, oppose this freedom, because it is the very condition of the search for truth.

The inclusion in French law of an "offense of obstructing conversion" would thus be useful legally and politically.

 

Signatories:

Moh. Christophe Bilek, convert, author of Des musulmans qui deviennent chrétiens - Signe des temps pour l’Eglise, Qabel, 2013.

Jean-François Chemain, author of Ils ont choisi le Christ. Ces convertis de l'Islam dont on ne parle pas, Artège, 2019.

Mehdi-Emmanuel Djaadi, convert, actor, author of the show Coming Out.

Joseph Fadelle, convert, author of the book The Price to Pay, L'Oeuvre, 2010.

Marc Fromager, director of the Mission Ismérie, former director of Aid to the Church in Need.

Annie Laurent, specialist in Islam, founder of the association Clarifier.

Father Fabrice Loiseau, founder of the Missionaries of Divine Mercy.

Yassine Mansour, convert, Phd student, University of Aix-Marseille.

Thibault de Montbrial, lawyer, President of the Centre de Réflexion sur la Sécurité Intérieure

Guy Stremsdoerfer, Epiphany community.

Said Oujibou, convert, Evangelical Pastor.

Grégor Puppinck, director of the ECLJ, initiator of the tribune.

Boualem Sansal, writer.

Other people who have left Islam support this tribune but remain anonymous for security reasons.

Defend Persecuted Christians
Read the full text of the petition

SIGNATURES

Cookies & Privacy

There is no advertising for any third party on our website. We merely use cookies to improve your navigation experience (technical cookies) and to allow us to analyze the way you consult our websites in order to improve it (analytics cookies). The personal information that may be requested on some pages of our website (subscribing to our Newsletter, signing a petition,  making a donation...) is optional. We do not share any of this information we may collect with third parties. You can check here for our privacy & security policy for more information.

I refuse analytics cookies